Monday, January 01, 2007

Brain dump

Random thoughts on some things going on in the blogosphere.

The Althouse-Goldberg-Liberty Fund Conference brouhaha

You can follow the links from this post to catch up. And depite Adler saying those were the "last words," I'll chime in (I doubt anyone will notice).

a.) Regardless about who's right on this, I think Althouse's reputation suffers from her involvement in this debate. My impression of her is someone who is accustomed to accusations of racism ending debates in favor of the person launching the accusation, and doesn't know how to handle it when it doesn't.

b.) Jonah Goldberg detacts a double standard that isn't quite apt for reasons Matthew Yglesias outlines here.

But it's also true that the civil rights movement and the abolitionist movement were largely fueled by religious conviction. Shouldn't the many commentators warning about the dangers of fusing faith and politics have to account more seriously for the possibility that what they are proposing would have choked these movements off? Isn't that more relevant history that the Crusades and the Inquisition? But I guess it's different because they were right and today's "Christianists" and "theocons" are wrong.

c.) If I'm basing a new ship's design on the design of the Titanic, I damn well better account for how my ship will avoid the same fate. If I'm proposing that we start using zeppelins again, I better be prepared to answer questions about the Hindenburg

And yes, if I'm going to say how great states' rights are, I better account for segregation and slavery.

Whether the Liberty Fund conference is a forum where this needs to take place is less clear.

Not a Bush Not A Nixon Not A Ford Not A Lincoln
Bruce Reed writes that Bush should emulate Ford in serving the remainder of his term in humility.

The thing is I don't think Bush is disposed to do that. And I don't think a President Kerry would have been either.

Ford is unique among presidents in that he never was elected or sought the office of vice president or president. Thus, this type of shot was in his bag.

But I think the type of person who would do everything it takes to launch a successful presidential run is not the type of person who is going to serve with humility. I also think it's human nature not to do that after all that work. I travelled all over the country, alienated my family, lived out of a suitcase for a solid year so I could stay out of the way? No, thank you.

In my opinion, the critical flaw of this administration is that it has aimed to maximize the power he has to do what Bush wants rather than doing the hard work of leading the country and the world community to support it. Maybe a different president would have a different style. But, "if elected, I will lead by building consensus!" doesn't exactly get people reaching for their checkbooks.

Football predictions


  • Chiefs over Colts -- Larry Johnson runs over the Colts; Dungy gets fired.
  • Cowboys over Seahawks -- I really think the Cowboys are better than their loss to the Lions.
  • Patriots over Jets -- Looks like the easiest call on the board, which gives me pause.
  • Eagles over Giants -- Both New York teams in playoff action against their closest geographical division rivals. Should be a fun week!


UPDATE -- Shut up, Thom Brenneman
In a thrilling Fiesta Bowl, Boise State scores a touch down to make the score 42-41 Oklahoma. Boise State lines up to go for two and the win. The Sooners call time out.

Thom Brenneman takes this opportunity to launch into the same tirade we've heard a million times about how the pluck Boise State has shown in this game shows why we need a playoff system. Then I hit the mute button.

My problems with this:

  • Can we just enjoy the damn game in front of us? The game we were watching was the most entertaining game of the year, with multiple lead changes and great performances. Isn't that enough? Must everything be about the national championship, and be grist for the same tired mill?

    The same thing was happening all day. During the end of Wisconsin's three point victory over Arkansas, Bob Griese was saying that this Big 10 victory over the SEC should help Michigan if they beat USC convincingly (which they didn't) and Florida squeaked by Ohio St.

    I propose a rule that announcers calling a game other than the actual championship game be barred from uttering the words "national champion."

  • Brenneman was advocating a system under which the tremendously entertaining game we were watching either would not take place or would take place under vastly different circumstances.

When I turned the sound back on the color analysts were saying something to the effect of, "let's focus on this play." After all, it was going to decide the outcome of the game.

But not have an impact on the "national championship."

2 comments:

august said...

While dumping --

I like football, but it annoys me how long the season lasts nowadays. It takes away from New Years day bowl games that the biggest games are still to come, and it takes away from the "national championship" game that it does not happen on New Year's Day.

And when is the Superbowl? May? It's getting to be like hockey -- crappy teams make the playoffs, and the playoffs take a third as long as the season. Making you wonder why bother with the regular season.

twiffer said...

august: that's what "parity" gets you. [grin]. actually, that is somewhat true. when people complain about the lack of parity in baseball, and hold football up as a standard, they forget that a) football dynasties are still possible and have been achieved recently and b) baseball has the most exclusive playoffs of the major north american pro sports.

john: this -But it's also true that the civil rights movement and the abolitionist movement were largely fueled by religious conviction. Shouldn't the many commentators warning about the dangers of fusing faith and politics have to account more seriously for the possibility that what they are proposing would have choked these movements off? Isn't that more relevant history that the Crusades and the Inquisition? But I guess it's different because they were right and today's "Christianists" and "theocons" are wrong. is a topic in and of itself.